That’s a pretty massive gap if you compare it to the 93.2 achieved by the RTX 4060 Ti. We’ve tested the GPU duo in several games, including titles such as Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Cyberpunk 2077, Horizon Zero Dawn, and Red Dead Redemption 2. Across our entire test suite, at ultra settings, the RX 7600 averages 66.3 frames per second (fps). Priced at $400, it’s bound to be picked up for 1440p gaming more often than the RX 7600, but of course, it does its best work in 1080p. Nvidia’s RTX 4060 Ti is a bit of a different story.
#Graphic card benchmark amd firepro 1080p#
Yes, it can handle some 1440p - especially if you’re generous with adjusting your graphics settings - but 1080p is where it gets to shine. At its $270 price point, it’s hard to expect anything else. The AMD RX 7600 is very much a 1080p graphics card. On the other hand, the RX 7600 also beats its last-gen counterparts with ease.
It loses to Nvidia in a big way, scoring 5,507 versus 8,132 points. Still, the RX 7600 is a far cry from its older sibling.
AMD has never been the king of ray tracing, although its flagship RX 7900 XTX has made leaps and bounds in that regard compared to the previous generation. Things look significantly worse when we look at the Port Royal score, which is a ray tracing test. The RTX 4060 Ti claims a strong lead here, with a 3DMark Time Spy score of 13,862 points compared to RX 7600’s 11,426. Surprisingly, it’s also defeated by Intel’s often-overlooked Arc A770 and Arc A750. In a 3DMark Time Spy test, the RX 7600 lands just under the last-gen RTX 3060 Ti and a fair bit ahead of the RX 6600 XT. Let’s go through some of our test results, starting with synthetic benchmarks. We’ve had the opportunity to thoroughly test both the RX 7600 and the RTX 4060 Ti, so we already know which model wins the performance race. The specs of each GPU may not tell the whole story, but the benchmarks certainly do. On the other hand, Nvidia’s RTX 4060 Ti has a higher boost clock speed, reaching 2.54GHz versus AMD’s 2.25GHz. Both also have the same narrow 128-bit memory bus and share the same 165W total board power (TBP) or total graphics power (TGP). Both cards sport a mere 8GB of VRAM, which could end up becoming a problem later on in some of the more demanding games. CUDAs and CUs don’t work the same way, though, so this doesn’t really translate to the RTX 4060 Ti having twice as much computational power as the RX 7600. However, we can note that the RTX 4060 Ti comes with 4,352 CUDA cores, while AMD’s RX 7600 sports 32 CUs (or 2,048 Stream Processors, also known as SMs). It’s honestly a lot like comparing apples to bananas.įor example, it’s hard to compare Nvidia’s CUDA cores to AMD’s Compute Units (CUs) due to the vastly different architectures used in each card. SpecsĬomparing the specifications of AMD and Nvidia graphics cards is always tricky. Moreover, only the 8GB RTX 4060 Ti will come in Nvidia’s own Founders Edition flavor - the other two will be prepared strictly by Nvidia’s board partners.
Only the 8GB Ti model launched in May, with the other two to follow later. Three separate versions of the RTX 4060 are on the way: the RTX 4060 Ti 8GB, RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, and lastly, the base RTX 4060. However, the story with the RTX 4060 Ti is not quite as straightforward as the AMD counterpart. Nvidia’s RTX 4060 Ti was launched one day earlier, on May 24, and priced at $400. The official list price (MSRP) for the RX 7600 has therefore been set to $270. Rumor has it that the AMD GPU was initially meant to be priced at $300, but AMD may have had a case of cold feet and changed the pricing last minute. RTX 4060: here’s how they stack upĪMD’s RX 7600 is the third card in the RDNA 3 lineup, launching after a long period of silence from Team Red. RTX 4070: comparing Nvidia’s midrange GPUs Why the Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti simply isn’t enough for 2023
0 kommentar(er)
